Top 9 forbidden weapons in wars, there are rules, damn it

The war: this big shitty thing that is shaking Europe at the moment. You are aware that at the time I am writing to you, Russia has declared war on Ukraine (by the way, if you want to know more about the origin of the tensions, you have this top on things to know to understand the conflict in Ukraine.) On the other hand, you will surely be surprised to learn that several conventions, some dating from the 17th century, have attempted to regulate human conflicts by prohibiting certain types of weapons, advising against use of certain ammunition etc. So of course, the real bad guys don’t care that the Hague has decided that good, fragmentation bullets are not good, but it is interesting to see what passes and does not pass in the event of a conflict, you will see

1. Lots of different gases

There is a whole list of gases prohibited by various conventions, in particular mustard gas which decimated the French trenches during the First World War, but also nerve gases such as sarin or even phosphine, all of which are very bad for the lungs and cause particular agony. strict. So that’s no, forbidden. More surprisingly, the tear gas often used by our law enforcement agencies is normally prohibited by the Hague Convention. Perhaps we should notify our CRS.

2. Plastic mines

Shredding guys in the mine, why not, unless they’re plastic, because it’s undetectable on X-rays and surgeons struggle to remove them from the bodies of the injured. You have the right to use plastic to build your weapons but it must not be the main ammunition.

3. Pits with spikes in the bottom

These traps which did great harm to American troops in Vietnam during World War II are banned by the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons of 1979. It must be said that the Vietcong and the Japanese used to coat the spikes with bamboo animal shit history of causing infections in addition to sometimes fatal injuries. Not very clean as war.

4. Biological weapons

Using animal feces on pit spikes could very well fall into this category even though the prohibited biological weapons are significantly more violent. Contrary to what one might think, biological weapons are very old and in the Middle Ages the corpses of infected animals or humans were already catapulted above the ramparts to spread the disease among the enemy. It is also forbidden to use contaminated living animals such as rats, fleas or locusts. This is serious war.

5. Flamethrowers

For the flamethrower it is a bit complex since it is not totally prohibited on the battlefield. We will just avoid using it near civilians and therefore, basically, burning people’s houses and people with them. On the other hand, against a tank, you have every right to take the watering can out of hell.

6. Napalm

Enough to disgust the most zealous veterans of Vietnam, but tell yourself that Napalm is like a flamethrower, there are small limits. No civilian areas, no destruction of forest (unless there are enemy tanks stashed in it), in short, if it is not totally prohibited, it is strongly advised not to take it out today.

7. Blinding laser beams

No, it’s not SF: for decades we have had lasers capable of burning the retina of the adversary and that, in war, we find that really not classy. As early as the 19th century, agreements were made not to use weapons that could cause blindness. We kill each other but we are not animals.

8. Different types of ammunition

In particular poisoned bullets (it was fashionable at the time when guns were not very precise) but also so-called “expanding” hollow point bullets which burst on contact with their target, causing terrible injuries. They were banned because they made death “inevitable”. While normal ammo hugs you when it hits you…

9. Different types of bombs

As with gas or ammunition, different types of bombs have been banned by conventions aimed at making warfare cleaner. “Dirty” and radioactive bombs as well as “salty” bombs specially designed to generate radioactive fallout are therefore prohibited. Here the concern is above all to protect civilians who don’t really like nuclear fallout in their mouths and largely prefer holes with spikes at the bottom.

WHAT IF RATHER WE FORBID WAR? EH ?

Source: Ranker

Related Posts

error: Content is protected !!